4.5 Article

Comprehensive targeted next-generation sequencing in Japanese familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 53, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.01.004

关键词

Familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; Genetic analysis; Next-generation sequencer; Japanese

资金

  1. Research Committee of CNS Degenerative Diseases from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan [H26-Nanchi-085]
  2. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology [15H05667, 16H05318, 16K15474]
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED [16ek0109013h0003, 16ek0109029h0003, 15ek0109067h0002]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26461288, 15H05667, 16K15474, 16H05318] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is anadult-onsetneurodegenerative disease characterizedby lossofmotor neurons. We have recently identified SOD1 and FUS mutations as the most common causes in a consecutive series of 111 familial ALS pedigrees in Japan. To reveal possible genetic causes for the remaining 51 patients with familial ALS (45 pedigrees), we performed targeted next-generation sequencing of 35 known ALS/motor neuron diseases-related genes. Known variants in ANG, OPTN, SETX, and TARDBP were identified in 6 patients. A novel likely pathogenic homozygous variant in ALS2 was identified in 1 patient. In addition, 18 patients harbored 1-3novelvariants of uncertainsignificance, whereas hexanucleotide repeat expansions inC9ORF72 were not detected using repeat-primed polymerase chain reaction. Collectively, in our Japanese cohort, the frequencies of SOD1, FUS, SETX, TARDBP, ANG, and OPTNvariantswere 32%, 11%, 2%, 2%, 1%, and 1%, respectively. These findings indicate considerable differences in the genetic variations associatedwith familial ALS across populations. Further genetic analyses and functional studies of novel variants are warranted. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据