4.5 Article

Burden of rare variants in ALS genes influences survival in familial and sporadic ALS

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF AGING
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.06.007

关键词

ALS; Genetics; Next generation sequencing; Survival

资金

  1. Liu Po Shan/Dr Vincent Liu Endowment Fund for Motor Neurone Disease
  2. Henry G. Leong Professorship in Neurology
  3. Donation Fund for Neurology Research
  4. Hong Kong Research Grants Council [AoE/M-04/ 04T12-708/12-N]
  5. European Community Seventh Framework Programme Grant on European Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI)
  6. HKU Seed Funding Programme for Basic Research [201411159172]
  7. Health and the Medical Research Fund [01121436]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic variants are implicated in the development of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but it is unclear whether the burden of rare variants in ALS genes has an effect on survival. We performed whole genome sequencing on 8 familial ALS (FALS) patients with superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) mutation and whole exome sequencing on 46 sporadic ALS (SALS) patients living in Hong Kong and found that 67% had at least 1 rare variant in the exons of 40 ALS genes; 22% had 2 or more. Patients with 2 or more rare variants had lower probability of survival than patients with 0 or 1 variant (p = 0.001). After adjusting for other factors, each additional rare variant increased the risk of respiratory failure or death by 60% (p = 0.0098). The presence of the rare variant was associated with the risk of ALS (Odds ratio 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.61, p = 0.03), and ALS patients had higher rare variant burden than controls (MB, p = 0.004). Our findings support an oligogenic basis with the burden of rare variants affecting the development and survival of ALS. (C) 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据