4.1 Review

Benzodiazepines for agitation in patients with delirium: selecting the right patient, right time, and right indication

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000395

关键词

benzodiazepines; delirium; neoplasms; palliative care; prognosis; treatment

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01CA214960-01A1, R21CA186000-01A1, R21NR016736]
  2. American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar Grant in Applied and Clinical Research [MRSG-14-1418-01-CCE]
  3. Andrew Sabin Family Fellowship Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose of review To provide an evidence-based synopsis on the role of benzodiazepines in patients with agitated delirium. Recent findings Existing evidence supports the use of benzodiazepines in two specific delirium settings: persistent agitation in patients with terminal delirium and delirium tremens. In the setting of terminal delirium, the goal of care is to maximize comfort, recognizing that patients are unlikely to recover from their delirium. A recent randomized trial suggests that lorazepam in combination with haloperidol as rescue medication was more effective than haloperidol alone for the management of persistent restlessness/agitation in patients with terminal delirium. In patients with refractory agitation, benzodiazepines may be administered as scheduled doses or continuous infusion for palliative sedation. Benzodiazepines also have an established role in management of delirium secondary to alcohol withdrawal. Outside of these two care settings, the role of benzodiazepine remains investigational and clinicians should exercise great caution because of the risks of precipitating or worsening delirium and over-sedation. Summary Benzodiazepines are powerful medications associated with considerable risks and benefits. Clinicians may prescribe benzodiazepines skillfully by selecting the right medication at the right dose for the right indication to the right patient at the right time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据