4.6 Review

Pediatric low-grade gliomas: next biologically driven steps

期刊

NEURO-ONCOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 160-173

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nox141

关键词

low-grade glioma; MAPK pathway; molecular diagnostics; neurooncology; pediatric brain tumor; targeted therapy

资金

  1. A Kids' Brain Tumor Cure-PLGA Foundation
  2. Gilbert Family Neurofibromatosis Institute
  3. Great Ormond Street Hospital Childrens Charity [W1075G, W1075F] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC011447] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the fact that they are not typically life-threatening, low-grade gliomas (LGGs) remain a significant clinical challenge in pediatric neuro-oncology due to comorbidities associated with these tumors and/or their treatments, and their propensity to multiply recurs. LGGs, in total the most common brain tumors arising in childhood, can often become a chronic problem requiring decades of management. The Second International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Low-Grade Gliomas held in Padua, Italy in 2016 was convened in an attempt to advance the pace of translating biological discoveries on LGGs into meaningful clinical benefit. Topics discussed included: the implications of our growing biological understanding of the genomics underlying these tumors; the assessment of the model systems available; the implications of the molecular and histopathologic differences between adult and pediatric diffuse gliomas; and steps needed to expedite targeted therapy into late-stage clinical trials for newly diagnosed cases. Methods for the diagnostic assessment of alterations in the Ras/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway, typical for these tumors, were also considered. While the overall tone was positive, with a consensus that progress is being and will continue to be made, the scale of the challenge presented by this complex group of tumors was also acknowledged. The conclusions and recommendations of the meeting panel are provided here as an outline of current thinking and a basis for further discussion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据