4.5 Article

Combination of CE-MS and advanced chemometric methods for high-throughput metabolic profiling

期刊

ELECTROPHORESIS
卷 36, 期 18, 页码 2324-2335

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elps.201500027

关键词

Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry; Metabolic profiling; Multivariate data analyses; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; Untargeted analysis

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Union [320737]
  2. Spain's Ministry of Education and Science [CTQ2011-27130]
  3. Catalan government [2014 SGR 1106]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, an untargeted approach based on capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) in combination with multivariate data analyses is proposed as a high-throughput general methodology for metabolomic studies. First, total ion electropherograms (TIEs) were considered for exploratory and classification purposes by means of principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). Then, multivariate curve resolution alternating least squares (MCR-ALS) was applied to the multiple full scan MS data sets. This strategy permitted the resolution of a large number of metabolites being characterized by their electrophoretic peaks and their corresponding mass spectra. The proposed approach allowed solving additional electrophoretic issues, such as background noise contributions, low signal-to-noise ratios, asymmetric peaks and migration time shifts. The usefulness of the proposed methodology is demonstrated in a comparative study of the metabolic profiles from baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) samples cultured at two temperatures, 30 degrees C and 37 degrees C. A total number of 80 metabolites were relevant to yeast samples differentiation at the two temperatures and almost 50 of them were tentatively identified based on their accurate experimental molecular mass. The results show that changes in amino acid, nucleotide and lipid metabolic pathways participated in the acclimatization of yeast cells to grow at 37 degrees C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据