4.7 Article

SWNT Networks with Polythiophene Carboxylate Links for High-Performance Silicon Monoxide Electrodes

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 6, 页码 2417-2423

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00522

关键词

poly[3-(potassium-4-butanoate) thiophene] (PPBT); single-walled carbon nanotube networks; silicon monoxide; electrical linkage; carboxylate bond; pi-pi interaction; surface chemistry

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carboxylated polythiophenes, such as poly[3-(potassium-4-butanoate) thiophene] (PPBT), play a critical role in securely connecting single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) electrical networks onto the surface of carbon-coated silicon monoxide (c-SiOx). These connections are a function of the materials' surface chemistries and resultant physical/chemical bonding through favorable molecular interactions. Specifically, the PPBT pi-conjugated backbone and alkyl side chain carboxylate moieties (COO-), respectively, physically interact with the SWNT and c-SiOx carbon layer pi-electron-rich surfaces, and chemically bind to surface hydroxyl (-OH) species of the c-SiOx electroactive materials to form a carboxylate bond. This approach effectively captured pulverized particles that form during battery operation and beneficially suppressed the thickness change that electrodes typically undergo. The resultant electrodes exhibited superior electrochemical performance, which was ascribed to stable SEI layer formation, reduced electrode resistance, and improved electrode kinetics. Moreover, electrodes fabricated by blending 30 wt % of c-SiOx with graphite using <3 wt % binder exhibited remarkable performance in both coin-type half-cell and pouch-type full-cell systems. The concept that introduces robust SWNT electrical networks with PPBT carboxylate linkages suggests a feasible approach for the design of practical, high-performance, and high-capacity anodes for battery applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据