4.7 Article

Effect of Different Rootstocks on the Salt Stress Tolerance in Watermelon Seedlings

期刊

HORTICULTURAL PLANT JOURNAL
卷 4, 期 6, 页码 239-249

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpj.2018.08.003

关键词

-

资金

  1. Shandong Province Modern Agricultural Technology System [SDAIT-05-05]
  2. Project of Bohai Granary Technology Demonstration in Shandong [2017BHLC020]
  3. Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China [2014BAD05B03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The selection of salt-tolerant watermelon rootstocks requires the evaluation of its underlying mechanism. The present study investigated the effect of applying 200 mmol.L-1 NaCl on various physiological and biochemical parameters of Citrullus lanatus 'Jingxin No.2' (abbreviated as W) seedlings grafted onto W, Cucurbita moschata 'Quanneng Tiejia' (P1), 'Kaijia No.1' (P2), and Lagenaria siceraria 'Hanzhen No.3' (G), which were grown hydroponically. All the measured growth parameters were significantly inhibited by salt stress, with W/P2 exhibiting superior growth. Salt stress increased Na+ uptake, which in turn disrupted K+/Na+ homeostasis in all grafting combinations. The photosynthetic capacity, chlorophyll concentration, and photochemical efficiency of photosystem II of all grafts significantly decreased with salt stress. However, W grafted onto G and P2 showed higher resistance than W grafted onto W and P1. Electrolyte leakage (EL) superoxide dismutase, catalase, peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase activity were significantly affected by both grafting and salt stress. Minimum EL was observed in W/P2, which also exhibited superior antioxidative capacity. Physiological and biochemical assessment indicated that W grafted onto the P2 rootstock displayed the greatest salt tolerance. Plants grafted onto salt-resistant P2 accumulated less Na+ and reactive oxygen species (ROS) and exhibited superior growth, photosynthesis, and ROS-scavenging capacity compared to those grafted onto the other rootstocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据