4.6 Review

Modulators of microglial activation and polarization after intracerebral haemorrhage

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY
卷 13, 期 7, 页码 420-433

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.69

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Heart Association (AHA) [13GRNT15730001]
  2. NIH [R01NS078026, R01AT007317]
  3. Stimulating and Advancing ACCM Research (StAAR) grant from Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine (ACCM), Johns Hopkins University
  4. AHA Mid-Atlantic Affiliate Postdoctoral Fellowship Award [15POST25090114]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is the most lethal subtype of stroke but currently lacks effective treatment. Microglia are among the first non-neuronal cells on the scene during the innate immune response to ICH. Microglia respond to acute brain injury by becoming activated and developing classic M1-like (proinflammatory) or alternative M2-like (anti-inflammatory) phenotypes. This polarization implies as yet unrecognized actions of microglia in ICH pathology and recovery, perhaps involving microglial production of proinflammatory or anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. Furthermore, alternatively activated M2-like microglia might promote phagocytosis of red blood cells and tissue debris, a major contribution to haematoma clearance. Interactions between microglia and other cells modulate microglial activation and function, and are also important in ICH pathology. This Review summarizes key studies on modulators of microglial activation and polarization after ICH, including M1-like and M2-like microglial phenotype markers, transcription factors and key signalling pathways. Microglial phagocytosis, haematoma resolution, and the potential crosstalk between microglia and T lymphocytes, neurons, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes in the ICH brain are described. Finally, the clinical and translational implications of microglial polarization in ICH are presented, including the evidence that therapeutic approaches aimed at modulating microglial function might mitigate ICH injury and improve brain repair.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据