4.6 Review

Perioperative events influence cancer recurrence risk after surgery

期刊

NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 205-218

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.194

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists
  2. David and Lorelle Skewes Foundation
  3. Peter Mac Foundation
  4. National Cancer Institute [CA160890]
  5. Cancer Research UK Clinical Research Fellowship
  6. British Journal of Anaesthesia/Royal College of Anaesthetists via the National Institute of Academic Anaesthesia
  7. Cancer Research UK Grand Challenge award [C59824/A25044]
  8. Institute of Cancer Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surgery is a mainstay treatment for patients with solid tumours. However, despite surgical resection with a curative intent and numerous advances in the effectiveness of (neo) adjuvant therapies, metastatic disease remains common and carries a high risk of mortality. The biological perturbations that accompany the surgical stress response and the pharmacological effects of anaesthetic drugs, paradoxically, might also promote disease recurrence or the progression of metastatic disease. When cancer cells persist after surgery, either locally or at undiagnosed distant sites, neuroendocrine, immune, and metabolic pathways activated in response to surgery and/or anaesthesia might promote their survival and proliferation. A consequence of this effect is that minimal residual disease might then escape equilibrium and progress to metastatic disease. Herein, we discuss the most promising proposals for the refinement of perioperative care that might address these challenges. We outline the rationale and early evidence for the adaptation of anaesthetic techniques and the strategic use of anti-adrenergic, anti-inflammatory, and/or antithrombotic therapies. Many of these strategies are currently under evaluation in large-cohort trials and hold promise as affordable, readily available interventions that will improve the postoperative recurrence-free survival of patients with cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据