4.7 Article

Diverse protocols for correlative super-resolution fluorescence imaging and electron microscopy of chemically fixed samples

期刊

NATURE PROTOCOLS
卷 12, 期 5, 页码 916-946

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2017.017

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  2. Intramural Research Program of the NHLBI, US National Institutes of Health
  3. Boettcher Foundation's Webb-Waring Biomedical Research Awards program
  4. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease [NIH_1R21AI127192-01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Our groups have recently developed related approaches for sample preparation for super-resolution imaging within endogenous cellular environments using correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM). Four distinct techniques for preparing and acquiring super-resolution CLEM data sets for aldehyde-fixed specimens are provided, including Tokuyasu cryosectioning, whole-cell mount, cell unroofing and platinum replication, and resin embedding and sectioning. The choice of the best protocol for a given application depends on a number of criteria that are discussed in detail. Tokuyasu cryosectioning is relatively rapid but is limited to small, delicate specimens. Whole-cell mount has the simplest sample preparation but is restricted to surface structures. Cell unroofing and platinum replication creates high-contrast, 3D images of the cytoplasmic surface of the plasma membrane but is more challenging than whole-cell mount. Resin embedding permits serial sectioning of large samples but is limited to osmium-resistant probes, and is technically difficult. Expected results from these protocols include super-resolution localization (similar to 10-50 nm) of fluorescent targets within the context of electron microscopy ultrastructure, which can help address cell biological questions. These protocols can be completed in 2-7 d, are compatible with a number of super-resolution imaging protocols, and are broadly applicable across biology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据