4.7 Article

A Novel Approach to the Layer-Number-Controlled and Grain-Size-Controlled Growth of High Quality Graphene for Nanoelectronics

期刊

ACS APPLIED NANO MATERIALS
卷 1, 期 4, 页码 1502-1512

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsanm.7b00410

关键词

graphene; synthesis; layer-number and grain-size controlled; high charge carrier mobility; adlayer growth; copper vapor assisted multilayer growth

资金

  1. Institute for Functional Nanomaterials (NSF) [1002410]
  2. PR NASA EPSCoR (NASA) [NNX15AK43A]
  3. PR Space Grant (NASA) [NNX15AI11H]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermal chemical vapor decomposition of methane on copper is the most widely employed technique for high quality and large area graphene growth. Graphene growth by this technique tends to be limited to a monolayer owing to the surface mediated self-limiting growth mechanism, and hence, it is difficult to obtain continuous bilayers and multilayers. We report the layer controlled growth of high quality and large area polycrystalline graphene on copper foil in a hot filament chemical vapor deposition (HFCVD) reactor and demonstrate that graphene can be grown with a controlled grain size in the range of 5-16 mu m. The field effect hole mobilities of the largest grain monolayer and bilayer graphene and the thickest few-layer graphene are 4310 +/- 348, 2745 +/- 276, and 2472 +/- 185 cm(2)V(-1)s(-1), respectively, which are comparable to that of high quality polycrystalline graphene and suitable for future nanoelectronics. The results of the systematic parametric study hereby presented indicate that graphene adlayers grow on top of the previously grown layer(s) and show that the HFCVD growth of graphene overcomes the difficulties to growing layer-controlled-graphene on copper. Copper vapor together with carbon radicals produced at the filaments appear to enable the adlayer graphene formation. The versatility and capability of the HFCVD for facile and inexpensive growth of graphene make it a superior technique for industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据