4.8 Article

Tuning a circular p-n junction in graphene from quantum confinement to optical guiding

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 12, 期 11, 页码 1045-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NNANO.2017.181

关键词

-

资金

  1. STM/STS [DOE-FG02-99ER45742]
  2. NSF DMR [1708158]
  3. ESF-EUROCORES-EuroGRAPHENE
  4. FWO VI
  5. Methusalem program of the Flemish government
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Materials Research [1708158] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Materials Research [1337871] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The photon-like propagation of the Dirac electrons in graphene, together with its record-high electronic mobility(1-3), can lead to applications based on ultrafast electronic response and low dissipation(4-6). However, the chiral nature of the charge carriers that is responsible for the high mobility also makes it difficult to control their motion and prevents electronic switching. Here, we show how to manipulate the charge carriers by using a circular p-n junction whose size can be continuously tuned from the nanometre to the micrometre scale(7,8). The junction size is controlled with a dual-gate device consisting of a planar back gate and a point-like top gate made by decorating a scanning tunnelling microscope tip with a gold nanowire. The nanometre-scale junction is defined by a deep potential well created by the tip-induced charge. It traps the Dirac electrons in quantum-confined states, which are the graphene equivalent of the atomic collapse states (ACSs) predicted to occur at supercritically charged nuclei(9-13). As the junction size increases, the transition to the optical regime is signalled by the emergence of whispering-gallery modes(14-16), similar to those observed at the perimeter of acoustic or optical resonators, and by the appearance of a Fabry-Perot interference pattern(17-20) for junctions close to a boundary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据