4.8 Review

How best to identify chromosomal interactions: a comparison of approaches

期刊

NATURE METHODS
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 125-134

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.4146

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust Strategic Award [106130/Z/14/Z]
  2. Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Training Fellowship [098931/Z/12/Z]
  3. Wellcome trust doctoral training programme [105281/Z/14/Z]
  4. MRC [MC_U137961144, G1000801, MC_U137961145, MC_UU_00016/4, MC_UU_12009/4, MC_UU_12009/15, MC_UU_00016/14] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G1000801j, G1000801, G1000801b, G1000801e, MC_UU_12009/4, MC_U137961144, MC_U137961145, MC_UU_00016/4] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Wellcome Trust [106130/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Wellcome Trust [098931/Z/12/Z, 105281/Z/14/Z, 106130/Z/14/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chromosome conformation capture (3C) methods are central. to understanding the link between nuclear structure and function, and the physical interactions between distal regulatory elements and promoters. However, no one method is appropriate to address all biological questions, as each variant differs markedly in resolution, reproducibility, throughput and biases. A thorough appreciation of the strengths and weaknesses of each technique is critical when choosing the correct method for a specific application or for gauging how best to interpret different sources of data. In addition, the analysis method must be carefully considered, as this choice can profoundly affect the output. In this Review, we describe and compare the different available 3C-based approaches, with a focus on the analysis of mammalian genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据