4.8 Article

CD22-targeted CAR T cells induce remission in B-ALL that is naive or resistant to CD19-targeted CAR immunotherapy

期刊

NATURE MEDICINE
卷 24, 期 1, 页码 20-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nm.4441

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural Research Program National Institute of Health
  2. National Cancer Institute National Institute of Health
  3. NIH Clinical Center National Institute of Health
  4. Stand Up to Cancer-St. Baldrick's Pediatric Dream Team translational [SU2C-AACR-DT113]
  5. St. Baldrick's Foundation
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [ZIABC011734, ZIABC011295, ZIABC011565] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  7. CLINICAL CENTER [ZIACL002120] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting CD19 mediate potent effects in relapsed and/or refractory pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but antigen loss is a frequent cause of resistance to CD19-targeted immunotherapy. CD22 is also expressed in most cases of B-ALL and is usually retained following CD19 loss. We report results from a phase 1 trial testing a new CD22-targeted CAR (CD22-CAR) in 21 children and adults, including 17 who were previously treated with CD19-directed immunotherapy. Dose-dependent antileukemic activity was observed, with complete remission obtained in 73% (11/15) of patients receiving >= 1 x 10(6) CD22-CAR T cells per kg body weight, including 5 of 5 patients with CD19(dim) or CD19(-) B-ALL. Median remission duration was 6 months. Relapses were associated with diminished CD22 site density that likely permitted CD22(+) cell escape from killing by CD22-CAR T cells. These results are the first to establish the clinical activity of a CD22-CAR in B-ALL, including leukemia resistant to anti-CD19 immunotherapy, demonstrating potency against B-ALL comparable to that of CD19-CAR at biologically active doses. Our results also highlight the critical role played by antigen density in regulating CAR function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据