4.8 Review

Towards properties on demand in quantum materials

期刊

NATURE MATERIALS
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 1077-1088

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/NMAT5017

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [DMR1609096]
  2. ARO [W911NF-17-1-0204, W911NF-16-1-0361]
  3. AFOSR [FA9550-15-1-0478]
  4. ONR [N00014-15-1-2671]
  5. NSF-EFRI EFMA [1741660]
  6. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation's EPiQS Initiative Investigator [GBMF4533]
  7. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  8. Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, an NSF Physics Frontier Center [PHY-1125565]
  9. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF1250]
  10. [DE-FG02-00ER45799]
  11. [DE-SC0018218]
  12. [DE-SC0012375]
  13. [ARO-W911NF-17-1-0543]
  14. Division Of Physics
  15. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1125565] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The past decade has witnessed an explosion in the field of quantum materials, headlined by the predictions and discoveries of novel Landau-symmetry-broken phases in correlated electron systems, topological phases in systems with strong spin-orbit coupling, and ultra-manipulable materials platforms based on two-dimensional van der Waals crystals. Discovering pathways to experimentally realize quantum phases of matter and exert control over their properties is a central goal of modern condensed- matter physics, which holds promise for a new generation of electronic/photonic devices with currently inaccessible and likely unimaginable functionalities. In this Review, we describe emerging strategies for selectively perturbing microscopic interaction parameters, which can be used to transform materials into a desired quantum state. Particular emphasis will be placed on recent successes to tailor electronic interaction parameters through the application of intense fields, impulsive electromagnetic stimulation, and nanostructuring or interface engineering. Together these approaches outline a potential roadmap to an era of quantum phenomena on demand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据