4.8 Article

Genome-wide association meta-analysis of 78,308 individuals identifies new loci and genes influencing human intelligence

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 49, 期 7, 页码 1107-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3869

关键词

-

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research [NWO VICI 453-14-005]
  2. Netherlands Scientific Organization [NWO: 480-05-003]
  3. VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  4. Dutch Brain Foundation
  5. BBSRC [BB/F022441/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MR/M021475/1, G0600237, G19/2, G0500079, MR/K002279/1, G0901245, G0901461, G0100594, G0900753] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/F022441/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [G0900753, G0500079, G0901245, G19/2, G0600237, MR/K002279/1, MC_qA137853, G0901461, G0100594, MR/M021475/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intelligence is associated with important economic and health-related life outcomes(1). Despite intelligence having substantial heritability(2) (0.54) and a confirmed polygenic nature, initial genetic studies were mostly underpowered3-5. Here we report a meta-analysis for intelligence of 78,308 individuals. We identify 336 associated SNPs (METAL P < 5 x 10(-8)) in 18 genomic loci, of which 15 are new. Around half of the SNPs are located inside a gene, implicating 22 genes, of which 11 are new findings. Gene-based analyses identified an additional 30 genes (MAGMA P < 2.73 x 10(-6)), of which all but one had not been implicated previously. We show that the identified genes are predominantly expressed in brain tissue, and pathway analysis indicates the involvement of genes regulating cell development (MAGMA competitive P = 3.5 x 10(-6)). Despite the well-known difference in twin-based heritability2 for intelligence in childhood (0.45) and adulthood (0.80), we show substantial genetic correlation (r(g) = 0.89, LD score regression P = 5.4 x 10(-29)). These findings provide new insight into the genetic architecture of intelligence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据