4.8 Article

TMPRSS2-ERG fusion co-opts master transcription factors and activates NOTCH signaling in primary prostate cancer

期刊

NATURE GENETICS
卷 49, 期 9, 页码 1336-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ng.3930

关键词

-

资金

  1. Prostate Cancer Canada
  2. Movember Foundation [RS2014-04, RS2014-01]
  3. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research - Government of Ontario
  4. Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation
  5. Radiation Medicine Program Academic Enrichment Fund
  6. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (CBCF) postdoctoral fellowship
  7. Terry Fox Research Institute New Investigator Award
  8. Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) New Investigator Award
  9. Canadian Cancer Society Research Scientist Award
  10. Investigator Award from the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
  11. CIHR New Investigator Award
  12. Movember Rising Star Award from Prostate Cancer Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TMPRSS2-ERG (T2E) structural rearrangements typify similar to 50% of prostate tumors and result in overexpression of the ERG transcription factor. Using chromatin, genomic and expression data, we show distinct cis-regulatory landscapes between T2E-positive and non-T2E primary prostate tumors, which include clusters of regulatory elements (COREs). This difference is mediated by ERG co-option of HOXB13 and FOXA1, implementing a T2E-specific transcriptional profile. We also report a T2E-specific CORE on the structurally rearranged ERG locus arising from spreading of the TMPRSS2 locus pre-existing CORE, assisting in its overexpression. Finally, we show that the T2E-specific cis-regulatory landscape underlies a vulnerability against the NOTCH pathway. Indeed, NOTCH pathway inhibition antagonizes the growth and invasion of T2E-positive prostate cancer cells. Taken together, our work shows that overexpressed ERG co-opts master transcription factors to deploy a unique cis-regulatory landscape, inducing a druggable dependency on NOTCH signaling in T2E-positive prostate tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据