4.1 Article

A NEW ANISIAN (MIDDLE TRIASSIC) EOSAUROPTERYGIAN (REPTILIA, SAUROPTERYGIA) FROM PANZHOU, GUIZHOU PROVINCE, CHINA

期刊

JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02724634.2018.1480113

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41372016, 41572008, 40920124002]
  2. Science and Technology Project in Guizhou Province of China [2904 [2016]]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [2016YFC0503301]
  4. National Geographic Society Committee for Research and Exploration [8669-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Eosauropterygians rapidly diversified in the Anisian (Middle Triassic), a period by which the invertebrates had already completely recovered from the end-Permian mass extinction. The Pelsonian (Anisian) deposits of the small Panxian and Luoping intraplatform basins in southwestern China alone yielded seven or more eosauropterygian taxa. A new Middle Triassic sauropterygian, Panzhousaurus rotundirostris, gen. et sp. nov., is here described based on an almost complete skeleton from the middle Anisian (Middle Triassic) of Panzhou (Guizhou Province, southwestern China). The upper temporal fenestra smaller than the orbit, the broad and flat parietal table, the cervical ribs with two proximal articular heads, the pachyostotic proximal ends of the dorsal ribs, and the unexpanded sacral ribs indicate that the specimen is a pachypleurosaur-like eosauropterygian. The new species also shows some differences from all other eosauropterygians, such as a rounded and shortened snout, 24 cervical and 20 dorsal vertebrae, a straight ulna with a concave posterior margin, and four distal carpals. Phylogenetic analysis also reveals that Panzhousaurus is an eosauropterygian, closely related to pachypleurosaur-like forms. The discovery of Panzhousaurus enriches our knowledge of the diversity of the Panxian fauna and provides new information to test phylogenetic relationships among known eosauropterygians.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据