4.8 Article

ZSCAN10 expression corrects the genomic instability of iPSCs from aged donors

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 9, 页码 1037-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3598

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R00HL093212, R01AG043531, CA196631-01A1, R21HD081682, R24DK092760, P01CA087497, R01GM112722]
  2. TriStemStar Foundation [2013-049]
  3. Louis V Gerstner, Jr. Young Investigators awards
  4. Geoffrey Beene Junior Chair Award
  5. Sidney Kimmel Scholar Award
  6. Alfred W. Bressler Scholars Endowment Fund
  7. MSKCC Society Fund
  8. NIH Cancer Center [P30 CA008748]
  9. UAB Development Fund
  10. Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine
  11. HHMI
  12. medical faculty of Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf
  13. MSKCC Single Cell Sequencing Initiative
  14. William and Joyce O'Neil Research Fund
  15. STARR visiting fellows programme
  16. American Italian Cancer Foundation
  17. Women in Science Rockefeller fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which are used to produce transplantable tissues, may particularly benefit older patients, who are more likely to suffer from degenerative diseases. However, iPSCs generated from aged donors (A-iPSCs) exhibit higher genomic instability, defects in apoptosis and a blunted DNA damage response compared with iPSCs generated from younger donors. We demonstrated that A-iPSCs exhibit excessive glutathione-mediated reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging activity, which blocks the DNA damage response and apoptosis and permits survival of cells with genomic instability. We found that the pluripotency factor ZSCAN10 is poorly expressed in A-iPSCs and addition of ZSCAN10 to the four Yamanaka factors (OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and c-MYC) during A-iPSC reprogramming normalizes ROS-glutathione homeostasis and the DNA damage response, and recovers genomic stability. Correcting the genomic instability of A-iPSCs will ultimately enhance our ability to produce histocompatible functional tissues from older patients' own cells that are safe for transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据