4.8 Article

EGFR signalling controls cellular fate and pancreatic organogenesis by regulating apicobasal polarity

期刊

NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 11, 页码 1313-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ncb3628

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research
  2. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) as part of the Beta Cell Biology Consortium [1 UO1 DK089570-01]
  3. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation
  5. Lundbeck Foundation [R100-A9422]
  6. Danish Council for Independent Research [DFF-1331-00310A]
  7. Danish Strategic Research Council
  8. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF15SA0016690, NNF17SA0030412] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Novo Nordisk Foundation Section for Basic Stem Cell Biology [Semb group NNF] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apicobasal polarity is known to affect epithelial morphogenesis and cell differentiation, but it remains unknown how these processes are mechanistically orchestrated. We find that ligand-specific EGFR signalling via PI(3) K and Rac1 autonomously modulates apicobasal polarity to enforce the sequential control of morphogenesis and cell differentiation. Initially, EGF controls pancreatic tubulogenesis by negatively regulating apical polarity induction. Subsequently, betacellulin, working via inhibition of atypical protein kinase C (aPKC), causes apical domain constriction within neurogenin+ endocrine progenitors, which results in reduced Notch signalling, increased neurogenin3 expression, and beta-cell differentiation. Notably, the ligand-specific EGFR output is not driven at the ligand level, but seems to have evolved in response to stage-specific epithelial influences. The EGFR-mediated control of beta-cell differentiation via apical polarity is also conserved in human neurogenin 3+ cells. We provide insight into how ligand-specific EGFR signalling coordinates epithelial morphogenesis and cell differentiation via apical polarity dynamics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据