4.8 Article

Dynamic regulation of metabolic flux in engineered bacteria using a pathway-independent quorum-sensing circuit

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 35, 期 3, 页码 273-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt.3796

关键词

-

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation through the CAREER program [CBET-0954986]
  2. Graduate Research Fellowship program
  3. Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center (SynBERC) [EEC-0540879]
  4. Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences [MCB-1517913]
  5. Biotechnology Training Program of the National Institutes of Health [T32GM008334]
  6. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Postdoctoral Fellowship [2013-67012-21022]
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences
  8. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1517913] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. NIFA [2013-67012-21022, 577635] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolic engineering of microorganisms to produce desirable products on an industrial scale can result in unbalanced cellular metabolic networks that reduce productivity and yield. Metabolic fluxes can be rebalanced using dynamic pathway regulation, but few broadly applicable tools are available to achieve this. We present a pathway-independent genetic control module that can be used to dynamically regulate the expression of target genes. We apply our module to identify the optimal point to redirect glycolytic flux into heterologous engineered pathways in Escherichia coli, resulting in titers of myo-inositol increased 5.5-fold and titers of glucaric acid increased from unmeasurable to >0.8 g/L, compared to the parent strains lacking dynamic flux control. Scaled-up production of these strains in benchtop bioreactors resulted in almost ten-and fivefold increases in specific titers of myo-inositol and glucaric acid, respectively. We also used our module to control flux into aromatic amino acid biosynthesis to increase titers of shikimate in E. coli from unmeasurable to > 100 mg/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据