4.6 Article

Inhibition of glioblastoma cell proliferation, invasion, and mechanism of action of a novel hydroxamic acid hybrid molecule

期刊

CELL DEATH DISCOVERY
卷 4, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41420-018-0103-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Research [MOP-119425]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Council of Canada [RGPIN 04994-15]
  3. Brilliant Night Foundation
  4. Croatian Science Foundation [IP-2014-09-1501]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glioblastoma multiforme is one of the most aggressive brain tumors and current therapies with temozolomide or suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA, vorinostat) show considerable limitations. SAHA is a histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor that can cause undesirable side effects due to the lack of selectivity. We show here properties of a novel hybrid molecule, sahaquine, which selectively inhibits cytoplasmic HDAC6 at nanomolar concentrations without markedly suppressing class I HDACs. Inhibition of HDAC6 leads to significant alpha-tubulin acetylation, thereby impairing cytoskeletal organization in glioblastoma cells. The primaquine moiety of sahaquine reduced the activity of Pglycoprotein, which contributes to glioblastoma multiforme drug resistance. We propose the mechanism of action of sahaquine to implicate HDAC6 inhibition together with suppression of epidermal growth factor receptor and downstream kinase activity, which are prominent therapeutic targets in glioblastoma multiforme. Sahaquine significantly reduces the viability and invasiveness of glioblastoma tumoroids, as well as brain tumor stem cells, which are key to tumor survival and recurrence. These effects are augmented with the combination of sahaquine with temozolomide, the natural compound quercetin or buthionine sulfoximine, an inhibitor of glutathione biosynthesis. Thus, a combination of agents disrupting glioblastoma and brain tumor stem cell homeostasis provides an effective anti-cancer intervention.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据