4.8 Article

Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity

期刊

NATURE
卷 541, 期 7637, 页码 353-+

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature21031

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (VR-RFI)
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [310039-PUZZLE_CELL, 294200-MICROENERGY]
  4. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research [SSF-FFL5]
  5. Swedish Research Council (VR grant) [2015-04959]
  6. Marie Curie IIF [331291]
  7. IEF [625521]
  8. European Union
  9. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF104]
  10. US Department of Energy (Sustainable Systems Scientific Focus Area [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  11. Swedish Research Council [2015-04959] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The origin and cellular complexity of eukaryotes represent a major enigma in biology. Current data support scenarios in which an archaeal host cell and an alphaproteobacterial (mitochondrial) endosymbiont merged together, resulting in the first eukaryotic cell. The host cell is related to Lokiarchaeota, an archaeal phylum with many eukaryotic features. The emergence of the structural complexity that characterizes eukaryotic cells remains unclear. Here we describe the 'Asgard' superphylum, a group of uncultivated archaea that, as well as Lokiarchaeota, includes Thor-, Odin- and Heimdallarchaeota. Asgard archaea affiliate with eukaryotes in phylogenomic analyses, and their genomes are enriched for proteins formerly considered specific to eukaryotes. Notably, thorarchaeal genomes encode several homologues of eukaryotic membrane-trafficking machinery components, including Sec23/24 and TRAPP domains. Furthermore, we identify thorarchaeal proteins with similar features to eukaryotic coat proteins involved in vesicle biogenesis. Our results expand the known repertoire of 'eukaryote-specific' proteins in Archaea, indicating that the archaeal host cell already contained many key components that govern eukaryotic cellular complexity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据