4.8 Article

Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids

期刊

NATURE
卷 545, 期 7652, 页码 54-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature22330

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH/National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [R01MH100900, R01MH100900-02S1]
  2. NIMH BRAINS Award [R01MH107800]
  3. California Institute of Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
  4. MQ Fellow Award
  5. Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation
  6. Kwan Research Fund
  7. Stanford Start-up Funds
  8. Child Research Health Institute (CHRI)
  9. Walter V. and Idun Berry Postdoctoral Fellowship
  10. Stanford Medicine Dean's Fellowship
  11. American Epilepsy Society
  12. Wishes for Elliott Foundation
  13. NIH [5P01HG00020526]
  14. UCSF Program for Breakthrough Biomedical Research
  15. Sandler Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of the nervous system involves a coordinated succession of events including the migration of GABAergic (gamma-aminobutyric-acid-releasing) neurons from ventral to dorsal forebrain and their integration into cortical circuits. However, these interregional interactions have not yet been modelled with human cells. Here we generate three-dimensional spheroids from human pluripotent stem cells that resemble either the dorsal or ventral forebrain and contain cortical glutamatergic or GABAergic neurons. These subdomain-specific forebrain spheroids can be assembled in vitro to recapitulate the saltatory migration of interneurons observed in the fetal forebrain. Using this system, we find that in Timothy syndrome-a neurodevelopmental disorder that is caused by mutations in the Ca(V)1.2 calcium channel-interneurons display abnormal migratory saltations. We also show that after migration, interneurons functionally integrate with glutamatergic neurons to form a microphysiological system. We anticipate that this approach will be useful for studying neural development and disease, and for deriving spheroids that resemble other brain regions to assemble circuits in vitro.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据