4.8 Article

T-cell invigoration to tumour burden ratio associated with anti-PD-1 response

期刊

NATURE
卷 545, 期 7652, 页码 60-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature22079

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [R01 AI105343, P01 AI108545, U19 AI082630, U19 AI117950, T32 2T32CA009615-26, P30-CA016520, P50-CA174523, P01CA114046, P30 CA008748, P01 CA114046, K08 AI114852, T32CA009140]
  2. Tara Miller Foundation
  3. German Research Foundation [BE5496/1-1]
  4. Penn Department of Medicine
  5. NCATS [KL2TR001879]
  6. Melanoma Research Alliance
  7. Robertson Foundation/Cancer Research Institute
  8. Ludwig Center for Cancer Immunotherapy
  9. Swim Across America
  10. Conquer Cancer Foundation
  11. Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the success of monotherapies based on blockade of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) in human melanoma, most patients do not experience durable clinical benefit. Pre-existing T-cell infiltration and/or the presence of PD-L1 in tumours may be used as indicators of clinical response; however, blood-based profiling to understand the mechanisms of PD-1 blockade has not been widely explored. Here we use immune profiling of peripheral blood from patients with stage IV melanoma before and after treatment with the PD-1-targeting antibody pembrolizumab and identify pharmacodynamic changes in circulating exhausted-phenotype CD8 T cells (Tex cells). Most of the patients demonstrated an immunological response to pembrolizumab. Clinical failure in many patients was not solely due to an inability to induce immune reinvigoration, but rather resulted from an imbalance between T-cell reinvigoration and tumour burden. The magnitude of reinvigoration of circulating Tex cells determined in relation to pretreatment tumour burden correlated with clinical response. By focused profiling of a mechanistically relevant circulating T-cell subpopulation calibrated to pretreatment disease burden, we identify a clinically accessible potential on-treatment predictor of response to PD-1 blockade.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据