4.8 Article

The Hippo kinases LATS1 and 2 control human breast cell fate via crosstalk with ERα

期刊

NATURE
卷 541, 期 7638, 页码 541-545

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature20829

关键词

-

资金

  1. Novartis Research Foundation
  2. European Research Council
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation
  4. Krebsliga Beider Basel
  5. Swiss Cancer League
  6. Department of Surgery of the University Hospital of Basel
  7. Swiss Initiative for Systems Biology (SystemsX.ch)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell fate perturbations underlie many human diseases, including breast cancer(1,2). Unfortunately, the mechanisms by which breast cell fate are regulated are largely unknown. The mammary gland epithelium consists of differentiated luminal epithelial and basal myoepithelial cells, as well as undifferentiated stem cells and more restricted progenitors(3,4). Breast cancer originates from this epithelium, but the molecular mechanisms that underlie breast epithelial hierarchy remain ill-defined. Here, we use a high-content confocal image-based short hairpin RNA screen to identify tumour suppressors that regulate breast cell fate in primary human breast epithelial cells. We show that ablation of the large tumour suppressor kinases (LATS) 1 and 2 (refs 5, 6), which are part of the Hippo pathway, promotes the luminal phenotype and increases the number of bipotent and luminal progenitors, the proposed cells-of-origin of most human breast cancers. Mechanistically, we have identified a direct interaction between Hippo and oestrogen receptor-alpha (ER alpha) signalling. In the presence of LATS, ERa was targeted for ubiquitination and Ddb1-cullin4-associated-factor 1 (DCAF1)-dependent proteasomal degradation. Absence of LATS stabilized ERa and the Hippo effectors YAP and TAZ (hereafter YAP/TAZ), which together control breast cell fate through intrinsic and paracrine mechanisms. Our findings reveal a non-canonical (that is, YAP/TAZ-independent) effect of LATS in the regulation of human breast cell fate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据