3.8 Proceedings Paper

Horticultural packaging systems of the future: improving reefer container usage

出版社

INT SOC HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2018.1201.30

关键词

carton design; refrigerated container; packaging system; forced-air cooling; packing density

资金

  1. South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
  2. National Research Foundation
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF [200021_169372]
  4. Coop Research Program of the ETH Zurich World Food System Center
  5. ETH Foundation
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_169372] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Large quantities of fresh produce, such as pome fruit, are exported every year to international markets across the world using refrigerated freight containers (RFC). However, the current packaging systems typically employs 1.2x1.0 m pallets, which leave about 10% of the RFC unused. The introduction of an improved packaging system that better utilises RFC volume and improves the cooling efficiency could enable a significant reduction in transport costs, carbon emissions and postharvest losses. This study therefore investigated two new packaging systems under forced-air cooling (FAC; horizontal airflow) and RFC (vertical airflow) conditions using computational fluid dynamics. The Tes packaging system consists of a novel pallet and carton design, which occupies 98.9% of the RFC floor area. The Hex packaging system, on the other hand, uses an isosceles trapezoid carton. The complimentary Hex pallet results in a 97.4% RFC floor area usage. For FAC, the Hex design had a reduced heat transfer rate (10%) compared to the standard (STD) design. Conversely, compared to the STD design, the Tes packaging system improved heat transfer rate by 6%. Overall, both the Hex and Tes packaging system are feasible designs. The lessons learnt in the conceptual study can guide future studies to further develop packaging systems that improve the RFC usage and cooling efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据