4.4 Article

Facile Linker Free Growth of CdS Nanoshell on 1-D ZnO: Solar Cell Application

期刊

ELECTRONIC MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 11, 期 2, 页码 171-179

出版社

KOREAN INST METALS MATERIALS
DOI: 10.1007/s13391-014-4236-x

关键词

core/shell; ZnO/CdS; semiconductor sensitized solar cell; nanorods

资金

  1. University Grants Commission (UGC)
  2. Department of Science and Technology India
  3. Converging Research Center program - Ministry of science, ICT and Future Planning [2013K000407]
  4. Human Resource Development of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant - Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy [20124010203180]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014M3C1A8048837] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One dimensional type-II core/shell heterostructures are widely employed in solar cells because of their adventitious role in both light absorption and charge separation. Here we report a facile two step chemical approach to synthesizing ZnO/CdS core/shell nanorod arrays. ZnO nanorods (ZNR) with a high aspect ratio were grown using a hydrothermal technique where a uniform CdS shell was deposited using a facile, linker free, one pot, Hexamethylenetetramine (HMTA) based reflux technique for the first time. Though the reflux technique is quite similar to the chemical bath deposition technique (CBD), we obtained more uniform CdS coating and improved solar cell performance with the ZnO/ CdS heterostructure compared to CBD-grown ZnO/CdS heterostructures. To obtain a conformal coating of CdS, we optimized the CdS deposition time. Formation of pure phase ZnO/CdS core/shell heterostructure was confirmed by high resolution transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) depth analysis. Improved solar cell performance of 1.23% was obtained for ZnO/CdS core/shell structures with ZnS surface treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据