4.8 Article

Genetic diversity of the African malaria vector Anopheles gambiae

期刊

NATURE
卷 552, 期 7683, 页码 96-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/nature24995

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [090770/Z/09/Z, 090532/Z/09/Z, 098051]
  2. Medical Research Council UK
  3. Department for International Development (DFID) [MR/M006212/1]
  4. MRC [G1100339]
  5. Foundation for the National Institutes of Health through Vector-Based Control of Transmission: Discovery Research (VCTR) program of the Grand Challenges in Global Health initiative of the Bill AMP
  6. Melinda Gates Foundation
  7. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [U19AI089674, R01AI082734]
  8. Sir Henry Wellcome Postdoctoral Fellowship
  9. Medical Research Council [G1100339, G1002624, G0600718B, MR/M006212/1, G0600718] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. Wellcome Trust [204911/Z/16/Z] Funding Source: researchfish
  11. MRC [G1100339, MR/M006212/1, G0600718, G1002624] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The sustainability of malaria control in Africa is threatened by the rise of insecticide resistance in Anopheles mosquitoes, which transmit the disease(1). To gain a deeper understanding of how mosquito populations are evolving, here we sequenced the genomes of 765 specimens of Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles coluzzii sampled from 15 locations across Africa, and identified over 50 million single nucleotide polymorphisms within the accessible genome. These data revealed complex population structure and patterns of gene flow, with evidence of ancient expansions, recent bottlenecks, and local variation in effective population size. Strong signals of recent selection were observed in insecticide-resistance genes, with several sweeps spreading over large geographical distances and between species. The design of new tools for mosquito control using gene-drive systems will need to take account of high levels of genetic diversity in natural mosquito populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据