4.6 Article

Highly-flexible, ultra-thin, and transparent single-layer graphene/silver composite electrodes for organic light emitting diodes

期刊

NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 28, 期 31, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/aa7a6a

关键词

graphene; silver; transparent conductive electrode; organic light emitting diodes

资金

  1. International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China [2014DFG12390]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2011AA03A110]
  3. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFB0401001]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61675088, 61275024, 61377026, 61274002, 61275033]
  5. Scientific and Technological Developing Scheme of Jilin Province [20130206020GX, 20130102009JC, 20140101204JC, 20140520071JH]
  6. Scientific and Technological Developing Scheme of Changchun [13GH02]
  7. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  8. Opened Fund of the State Key Laboratory on Integrated Optoelectronics [IOSKL2012KF01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transparent conductive electrode (TCE) platforms are required in many optoelectronic devices, including organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs). To date, indium tin oxide based electrodes are widely used in TCEs but they still have few limitations in term of achieving flexible OLEDs and display techniques. In this paper, highly-flexible and ultra-thin TCEs were fabricated for use in OLEDs by combining single-layer graphene (SLG) with thin silver layers of only several nanometers in thickness. The as-prepared SLG + Ag (8 nm) composite electrodes showed low sheet resistances of 8.5 Omega/square, high stability over 500 bending cycles, and 74% transmittance at 550 nm wavelength. Furthermore, SLG + Ag composite electrodes employed as anodes in OLEDs delivered turn-on voltages of 2.4 V, with luminance exceeding 1300 cd m(-2) at only 5 V, and maximum luminance reaching up 40 000 cd m(-2) at 9 V. Also, the devices could work normally under less than the 1 cm bending radius.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据