4.3 Article

Side Flow Effect on Surface Generation in Nano Cutting

期刊

NANOSCALE RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGEROPEN
DOI: 10.1186/s11671-017-2136-3

关键词

Nano cutting; Side flow; Surface generation; Plastic deformation; Cutting mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [91423101, 51320105009]
  2. National Key Research & Development Program [2016YFB1102200]
  3. State Administration of Foreign Experts Affair
  4. Ministry of Education of China [B07014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The side flow of material in nano cutting is one of the most important factors that deteriorate the machined surface quality. The effects of the crystallographic orientation, feed, and the cutting tool geometry, including tool edge radius, rake angle and inclination angle, on the side flow are investigated employing molecular dynamics simulation. The results show that the stagnation region is formed in front of tool edge and it is characterized by the stagnation radius R-s and stagnation height h(s). The side flow is formed because the material at or under the stagnation region is extruded by the tool edge to flow to the side of the tool edge. Higher stagnation height would increase the size of the side flow. The anisotropic nature of the material which partly determines the stagnation region also influences the side flow due to the different deformation mechanism under the action of the tool edge. At different cutting directions, the size of the side flow has a great difference which would finally affect the machined surface quality. The cutting directions of {100} < 011 >, {110} < 001 >, and {110} < 1-10 > are beneficial to obtain a better surface quality with small side flow. Besides that, the side flow could be suppressed by reducing the feed and optimizing the cutting tool geometry. Cutting tool with small edge radius, large positive rake angle, and inclination angle would decrease the side flow and consequently improve the machined surface quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据