4.8 Article

Key role of surface oxidation and reduction processes in the coarsening of Pt nanoparticles

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 9, 期 35, 页码 13159-13170

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr04278g

关键词

-

资金

  1. FWO-Vlaanderen
  2. BOF-UGent [GOA 01G01513]
  3. Hercules foundation [AUGE/09/014]
  4. FWO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Particle coarsening is the main cause for thermal deactivation and lifetime reduction of supported Pt nanocatalysts. Here, Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) was used to prepare a model system of Pt nanoparticles with high control over the metal loading and the nanoparticle size and coverage. A series of samples with distinct as-deposited size and interparticle spacing was annealed under different oxygen environments while Grazing Incidence Small Angle X-ray Scattering (GISAXS) was employed as in situ tool for monitoring the change in average nanoparticle size. The obtained results revealed three morphological stages during the thermal treatment, which can be explained by (I) the formation of a PtO2 shell on stable Pt nanoparticles at low temperature (below 300 degrees C), (II) the reduction of the PtO2 shell at moderate temperature (300 to 600 degrees C), creating mobile species that trigger particle coarsening until a steady morphological state is reached, and (III) the evaporation of PtO2 at high temperature (above 650 degrees C), causing particle instability and coarsening reactivation. The onset temperatures for stages (II) and (III) were found to depend on the initial particle size and spacing as well as on the O-2 partial pressure during annealing, and could be summarized in a morphological stability diagram for Pt nanoparticles. The coarsening model indicates an important role for the reduction of the PtO2 shell in inducing particle coarsening. The key role of the reduction process was corroborated through isothermal experiments under decreasing O-2 partial pressure and through forced reduction experiments near room temperature via H-2 exposure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据