4.8 Article

Towards higher electron mobility in modulation doped GaAs/AlGaAs core shell nanowires

期刊

NANOSCALE
卷 9, 期 23, 页码 7839-7846

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7nr00680b

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC (UK)
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [137648, 156081]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M017095/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/M017095/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precise control over the electrical conductivity of semiconductor nanowires is a crucial prerequisite for implementation of these nanostructures into novel electronic and optoelectronic devices. Advances in our understanding of doping mechanisms in nanowires and their influence on electron mobility and radiative efficiency are urgently required. Here, we investigate the electronic properties of n-type modulation doped GaAs/AlGaAs nanowires via optical pump terahertz (THz) probe spectroscopy and photoluminescence spectroscopy over the temperature range 5 K-300 K. We directly determine an ionization energy of 6.7 +/- 0.5 meV (T = 52 K) for the Si donors within the AlGaAs shell that create the modulation doping structure. We further elucidate the temperature dependence of the electron mobility, photoconductivity lifetime and radiative efficiency, and determine the charge-carrier scattering mechanisms that limit electron mobility. We show that below the donor ionization temperature, charge scattering is limited by interactions with interfaces, leading to an excellent electron mobility of 4360 +/- 380 cm(2) V-1 s(-1) at 5 K. Above the ionization temperature, polar scattering via longitudinal optical (LO) phonons dominates, leading to a room temperature mobility of 2220 +/- 130 cm(2) V-1 s(-1). In addition, we show that the Si donors effectively passivate interfacial trap states in the nanowires, leading to prolonged photoconductivity lifetimes with increasing temperature, accompanied by an enhanced radiative efficiency that exceeds 10% at room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据