4.6 Article

Lectin-functionalized mesoporous silica nanoparticles for endoscopic detection of premalignant colonic lesions

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.03.014

关键词

Colorectal tumors; Endoscopic; Mesoporous silica nanoparticle; Ulex europaeus Agglutinin 1 (UEA1)

资金

  1. National Health Research Institutes of Taiwan [BN-103-PP-04, NM-103-PP-01]
  2. National Science Council/Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan [NSC-100-2911-I-400-502, NSC-100-2917-I-002-030, NSC102-2113-M-400-001-MY3, MOST105-2113-M-400-007-MY3, MOST106-2113-M-039-002-MY2]
  3. China Medical University, Taiwan [CMU105-N-11]
  4. NIH/NCI [R01CA171785, CA036745]
  5. NIH/NCCAM [AT004418, AT005362]
  6. Samuel Freedman Research Laboratories for Gastrointestinal Cancer Research
  7. University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-deaths worldwide. Methods for the early in situ detection of colorectal adenomatous polyps and their precursors-prior to their malignancy transformation into CRC-are urgently needed. Unfortunately at present, the primary diagnostic method, colonoscopy, can only detect polyps and carcinomas by shape/morphology; with sessile polyps more likely to go unnoticed than polypoid lesions. Here we describe our development of polyp-targeting, fluorescently-labeled mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) that serve as targeted endoscopic contrast agents for the early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer. In vitro cell studies, ex vivo histopathological analysis, and in vivo colonoscopy and endoscopy of murine colorectal cancer models, demonstrate significant binding specificity of our nanoconstructs to pathological lesions via targeting aberrant a-L-fucose expression. Our findings strongly suggest that lectin-functionalized fluorescent MSNs could serve as a promising endoscopic contrast agent for in situ diagnostic imaging of premalignant colonic lesions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据