4.8 Article

Black phosphorus induced photo-doping for high-performance organic-silicon heterojunction photovoltaics

期刊

NANO RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 3848-3856

出版社

TSINGHUA UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-017-1598-z

关键词

black phosphorus; zinc oxide; light induced dopant; photovoltaics

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2012CB932402]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91123005, 61674108]
  3. Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Carbon-Based Functional Materials Devices
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  5. Collaborative Innovation Centre of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In conventional crystalline silicon (Si) homojunction solar cells, a strategy of doping by transporting phosphorus or boron impurities into Si is commonly used to build Ohmic contacts at rear electrodes. However, this technique involves an energy intensive, high temperature (similar to 800 degrees C) process and toxic doping materials. Black phosphorus (BP) is a two-dimensional, narrow bandgap semiconductor with high carrier mobility that exhibits broad light harvesting properties. Here, we place BP: zinc oxide (ZnO) composite films between Si and aluminum (Al) to improve their contact. Once the BP harvests photons with energies below 1.1 eV from the crystalline Si, the ZnO carrier concentration increases dramatically due to charge injection. This photo-induced doping results in a high carrier concentration in the ZnO film, mimicking the modulated doping technique used in semiconductor heterojunctions. We show that photo-induced carriers dramatically increase the conductivities of the BP-modified ZnO films, thus reducing the contact resistance between Si and Al. A photovoltaic power conversion efficiency of 15.2% is achieved in organic-Si heterojunction solar cells that use a ZnO:BP layer. These findings demonstrate an effective way of improving Si/metal contact via a simple, low temperature process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据