4.8 Article

Broadband Absorbing Semiconducting Polymer Nanoparticles for Photoacoustic Imaging in Second Near-Infrared Window

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 4964-4969

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02106

关键词

Polymer nanoparticles; photoacoustic imaging; second near-infrared window; brain imaging

资金

  1. Nanyang Technological University [NTU-SUG: M4081627.120]
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education [RG133/15 M4011559, MOE2016-T2-1-098]
  3. Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council [NMRC/OFIRG/0005/2016: M4062012]
  4. Singapore National Research Foundation through the NRF Investigator ship Award [NRF-NRFI2015-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photoacoustic (PA) imaging holds great promise for preclinical research and clinical practice. However, most studies rely on the laser wavelength in the first near infrared (NIR) window (NIR-I, 650-950 nm), while few studies have been exploited in the second NIR window (NIR-II, nm), mainly due to the lack of NIR-II absorbing contrast agents. We herein report the synthesis of a broadband absorbing PA contrast agent based on semi-conducting polymer nanoparticles (SPN-II) and apply it for PA imaging in NIR-II window. SPN-II can absorb in both NIR-I and NIR-II regions, providing the feasibility to directly compare PA imaging at 750 nm with that at 1064 nm. Because of the weaker background PA signals from biological tissues in NIR-II window, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of SPN-II resulted PA images at 1064 nm can be 1.4-times higher than that at 750 nm when comparing at the imaging depth of 3 cm. The proof-of-concept application of NIR-II PA imaging is demonstrated in in-vivo imaging of brain vasculature in living rats, which showed 1.5-times higher SNR as compared with NIR-I PA imaging. Our study not only introduces the first broadband absorbing organic contrast agent that is applicable for PA imaging in both NIR-I and NIR-II windows but also reveals the advantages of NIR-II over NIR-I in PA imaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据