4.8 Article

Terahertz Light-Matter Interaction beyond Unity Coupling Strength

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 17, 期 10, 页码 6340-6344

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03103

关键词

Quantum electrodynamics; ultrastrong coupling; terahertz; metamaterials

资金

  1. European Research Council [305003]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [LA 3307/1-1, HU 1598/2-1, BO 3140/3-1]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Collaborative Research Center) [SFB 689]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [305003] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Achieving control over light matter interaction in custom-tailored nanostructures is at the core of modern quantum electrodynamics. In strongly and ultrastrongly coupled systems, the excitation is repeatedly exchanged between a resonator and an electronic transition at a rate known as the vacuum Rabi frequency Omega(R). For Omega(R) approaching the resonance frequency omega(c) novel quantum phenomena including squeezed states, Dicke super radiant phase transitions, the collapse of the Purcell effect, and a population of the ground state with virtual photon pairs are predicted. Yet, the experimental realization of optical systems with Omega(R)/omega(c) >= 1 has remained elusive. Here, we introduce a paradigm change in the design of light matter coupling by treating the electronic and the photonic components of the system as an entity instead of optimizing them separately. Using the electronic excitation to not only boost the electronic polarization but furthermore tailor the shape of the vacuum mode, we push Omega(R)/omega(c) of cyclotron resonances ultrastrongly coupled to metamaterials far beyond unity. As one prominent illustration of the unfolding possibilities, we calculate a ground state population of 0.37 virtual photons for our best structure with Omega(R)/omega(c) = 1.43 and suggest a realistic experimental scenario for measuring vacuum radiation by cutting-edge terahertz quantum detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据