4.8 Article

Stable Graphene-Two-Dimensional Multiphase Perovskite Heterostructure Phototransistors with High Gain

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 17, 期 12, 页码 7330-7338

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b02980

关键词

Two-dimensional perovskite; graphene; phototransistors; photoconductive gain; stability

资金

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA9550-14-1-0277]
  2. Office of Naval Research [N00014-14-0565]
  3. Yale Institute for Nanoscience and Quantum Engineering (YINQE)
  4. NSF MRSEC [DMR 1119826]
  5. National Science Foundation [CMMI-1265834]
  6. Department of Home Security [2014-DN-077-ARI069-03]
  7. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [JP15K21722]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently, two-dimensional (2D) organic-inorganic perovskites emerged as an alternative material for their three-dimensional (3D) counterparts in photovoltaic applications with improved moisture resistance. Here, we report a stable, high gain phototransistor consisting of a monolayer graphene on hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) covered by a 2D multiphase perovskite heterostructure, which was realized using a newly developed two-step ligand exchange method. In this phototransistor, the multiple phases with varying bandgap in 2D perovskite thin films are aligned for the efficient electron hole pair separation, leading to a high responsivity of similar to 10(5) A W-1 at 532 nm. Moreover, the designed phase alignment method aggregates more hydrophobic butylammonium cations close to the upper surface of the 2D perovskite thin film, preventing the permeation of moisture and enhancing the device stability dramatically. In addition, faster photoresponse and smaller 1/f noise observed in the 2D perovskite phototransistors indicate a smaller density of deep hole traps in the 2D perovskite thin film compared with their 3D counterparts. These desirable properties not only improve the performance of the phototransistor, but also provide a new direction for the future enhancement of the efficiency of 2D perovskite photovoltaics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据