3.8 Article

Precision Intravitreal Chemotherapy for Localized Vitreous Seeding of Retinoblastoma

期刊

OCULAR ONCOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY
卷 5, 期 4, 页码 284-289

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000491432

关键词

Retina; Retinoblastoma; Intravitreal chemotherapy; Melphalan; Precision injection; Retinal toxicity

资金

  1. Eye Tumor Research Foundation, Philadelphia, PA, USA
  2. Lucille Weidman Fund for Pediatric Eye Cancer, Philadelphia PA, USA
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc.
  4. Heed Ophthalmic Foundation
  5. VitreoRetinal Surgery Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To describe and evaluate the effectivity of a novel precision intravitreal injection technique for select cases of localized vitreous seeding in retinoblastoma. Methods: Patients with localized vitreous seeds from retinoblastoma received intravitreal chemotherapy via a precision injection technique (P-IVitC) intended to optimize local delivery of melphalan to target seeds. The needle was inserted trans-pars plana and chemotherapy deposited within 3 mm of the target seed(s) under indirect ophthalmoscopic guidance. Without subsequent globe manipulation, the head was then positioned to promote gravity-dependent settling of chemotherapy. Results: There were 8 eyes of 8 patients treated with P-IVitC for active vitreous seeds following adequate solid tumor control with intravenous chemotherapy (n = 3, 38%) or intra-arterial chemotherapy (n = 5, 63%). Viable vitreous seeds were primarily solitary spheres (n = 6, 75%) and measured an average of 2.7 mm in diameter. Vitreous seed resolution (n = 8, 100%) was noted after a mean of 2.6 injections (median 2; range 1-3) of 20 mu g melphalan. There was no recurrence at a mean follow-up of 10.0 months. Only 1 eye had an associated complication (focal retinal pigment epithelial mottling, n = 1, 13%). Conclusions: With direct delivery of chemotherapy to within 3-4 mm of vitreous seed activity, P-IVitC provided complete control of localized vitreous seeds with minimal toxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据