4.8 Article

Activation of Sodium Storage Sites in Prussian Blue Analogues via Surface Etching

期刊

NANO LETTERS
卷 17, 期 8, 页码 4713-4718

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01366

关键词

Activation; Prussian blue analogues; etching; sodium ion batteries; solid-state diffusion

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202603]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB934103]
  3. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B17034]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51521001]
  5. National Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [51425204]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2016III001, 2017IVA100]
  7. project of Innovative Group for Low Cost and Long Cycle Life Na-ion Batteries R&D and industrialization of Guangdong Province [2014ZT05N013]
  8. China Scholarship Council [201606955096]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sodium-ion battery technologies are known to suffer from kinetic problems associated with the solid-state diffusion of Na+ in intercalation electrodes, which results in suppressed specific capacity and degraded rate performance. Here, a controllable selective etching approach is developed for the synthesis of Prussian blue analogue (PBA) with enhanced sodium storage activity. On the basis of time dependent experiments, a defect-induced morphological evolution mechanism from nanocube to nanoflower structure is proposed. Through in situ X-ray diffraction measurement and computational analysis, this unique structure is revealed to provide higher Na+ diffusion dynamics and negligible volume change during the sodiation/desodiation processes. As a sodium ion battery cathode, the PBA exhibits a discharge capacity of 90 mA h g(-1), which is in good agreement with the complete low spin Fe-LS(C) redox reaction. It also demonstrates an outstanding rate capability of 71.0 mA h g(-1) at 44.4 C, as well as an unprecedented cycling reversibility over 5000 times.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据