4.2 Article

Molecular taxonomy and morphological characterization reveal new species and new host records of Torula species (Torulaceae, Pleosporales)

期刊

MYCOLOGICAL PROGRESS
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 447-461

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11557-017-1292-2

关键词

Asexual fungi; Dothideomycetes; Hyphomycetous; Multigene phylogeny

类别

资金

  1. Thailand Research Fund (TRF) [BRG5280002, 567110754]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2013T2S0030]
  3. Mushroom Research Foundation
  4. CAS President's International Fellowship [2017 PB0072]
  5. Research and Researchers for Industries (RRI) under the Thailand Research Fund [PHD57I0012]
  6. Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University [PRG-1436-09]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Four new species and two new host records of Torula (Torulaceae, Pleosporales) are described and illustrated from herbaceous litter collected in Italy and Thailand. The new species possess colony, conidiophore and conidial characteristics that fit within the generic concept of Torula. Detailed morphological observations clearly demarcate four of these from extant species and are hence described as new (Torula chiangmaiensis sp. nov., Torula pluriseptata sp. nov., Torula chromolaenae sp. nov., Torula mackenziei sp. nov.). Details of asexual morphs are described, and justifications for establishing these new species are provided. The nuclear are sequenced ribosomal RNA genes as well as protein coding genes to infer phylogenetic relationships and discuss phylogenetic affinities with morphologically similar species. Our morphological distinction is further supported by phylogenetic discrimination. In particular, phylogenies depict a close relationship of Torula chiangmaiensis and T. pluriseptata to T. hollandica, while T. chromolaenae and T. mackenziei constitute an independent phylogenetic lineage basal to T. herbarum and T. ficus. Torula ficus and T. masonii are also described and their phylogeny investigated as new host records from Bidens pilosa and Iris germanica, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据