4.2 Article

Phylogenetic systematics of Syncephalis (Zoopagales, Zoopagomycotina), a genus of ubiquitous mycoparasites

期刊

MYCOLOGIA
卷 109, 期 2, 页码 333-349

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00275514.2017.1307005

关键词

ITS region; molecular phylogenetics; mycoparasite; Piptocephalidaceae

类别

资金

  1. NSF as part of the ZygoLife project [DEB-1441677]
  2. Department of Plant Pathology at the University of Florida
  3. Institute for Food and Agricultural Sciences (IFAS) at the University of Florida

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined phylogenetic relationships among species of the mycoparasite genus Syncephalis using sequences from three nuclear ribsosomal DNA genes (18S, 5.8S, and 28S nuc rDNA) and a gene encoding the largest subunit of RNA polymerase II (RPB1). Our data set included 88 Syncephalis isolates comprising 23 named species and several unnamed taxa. We also revived a culturing technique using beef liver and cellophane to grow several Syncephalis isolates without their host fungi to obtain pure parasite DNA. Most isolates, however, were grown in co-cultures with their host fungi, so we designed Syncephalis-specific primers to obtain sequence data. Individual and combined data sets were analyzed by maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods. We recovered 20 well-supported lineages and 38 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Most major clades contained isolates from distant localities on multiple continents. There were taxonomic and nomenclature issues within several clades, probably due to high phenotypic plasticity or species dimorphism. We also conducted an analysis of Syncephalis nuc rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences for 31 phylogenetically diverse isolates, and we determined that most Syncephalis species have long ITS sequences relative to other fungi. Although commonly employed eukaryotic and fungal primers are compatible with diverse Syncephalis species, the ITS sequences of Syncepahlis are nonetheless rarely recovered in environmental molecular diversity surveys.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据