4.6 Article

Electrochemical properties of α-MoO3-coated Li [Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O2 cathode material for Li-ion batteries

期刊

ELECTROCHIMICA ACTA
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 1171-1181

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.167

关键词

Lithium ion battery; Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2; alpha-MoO3; Coating; Electrochemical properties

资金

  1. Special Fund of the Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation Project in Jiangsu Province [BA2013142]
  2. Jiangsu Province Natural Science Fund Project [BK20130800]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [NS2014054]
  4. Funding of Shanghai Academy of Spaceflight Technology [SAST201371]
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

MoO3-coated Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2 cathode materials were synthesized via using co-precipitation method and wet coating process, and their crystal structure and particle morphology were analyzed and observed by XRD, SEM and TEM. The electrochemical properties of these materials were investigated and analyzed by using charge-discharge tests and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. The results showed that the surface coating on Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2 cathode was composed of alpha-MoO3 and Li2MoO4, and the electrochemical properties were improved after coated with MoO3 thin films. The initial coulombic efficiencies increased from 71.2% to 79.3% when the MoO3 content increased to 5 wt.%. Particularly, the 3 wt.% MoO3-coated Li[Li0.2Mn0.54Ni0.13Co0.13]O-2 showed the highest capacity retention of 90.8% after 100 cycles, and possessed the excellent rate discharge performance. The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and cyclic voltammetric results demonstrated that the layered MoO3 coating could restrain the increment of the charge transfer resistance and stabilize the active material structure during cyclic process. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据