4.3 Article

Treatment response to dimethyl fumarate is characterized by disproportionate CD8+T cell reduction in MS

期刊

MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL
卷 24, 期 5, 页码 632-641

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1352458517703799

关键词

Multiple sclerosis; dimethyl fumarate; treatment response; lymphocyte subsets; CD8+T cells

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SFB-TR 128/Z02]
  2. Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF, Competence Network Multiple Sclerosis (KKNMS))
  3. Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (JGU) (Inneruniversitare Forschungsforderung (Stufe I)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The effect of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) on circulating lymphocyte subsets and their contribution as predictors of clinical efficacy have not yet been investigated in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: To evaluate lymphocytes and lymphocyte subsets (analyzed 6 months after DMF start) in MS patients with and without disease activity after 1 year of treatment in a retrospective study. Methods: Peripheral blood lymphocyte subsets were analyzed by flow cytometry. Untreated MS patients (n = 40) were compared to those 6 months after onset of DMF treatment (n = 51). Clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) disease activity of DMF-treated patients were assessed in the first year under treatment. Results: Stable patients showed significantly lower lymphocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells as well as CD19+ B cells compared to active patients under DMF treatment. Furthermore, an increased CD4/CD8 ratio (p < 0.025) in stable patients indicated a disproportionate reduction of CD8+ T cells relative to CD4+ T cells. Reduced lymphocytes, CD8+ T cells, and CD19+ B cells 6 months after DMF start allowed prediction of the treatment response in the first year. Conclusion: DMF treatment response is reflected by lower circulating lymphocytes and specific lymphocyte subsets. Changes in the cellular immune profiles under DMF treatment are clinically relevant and might serve as a surrogate marker of treatment response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据