4.6 Review

Segmentation of blood vessels using rule-based and machine-learning-based methods: a review

期刊

MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 109-118

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00530-017-0580-7

关键词

Blood vessel; Segmentation; Rule-based; Machine learning; Deep neural network

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61601363, 61372046, 61640418, 61401264, 11571012, 81530058, 61601154, 61502387]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC1300300]
  3. Science and Technology Plan Program in Shaanxi Province of China [2013K12-20-12, 2015KW-002]
  4. Natural Science Research Plan Program in Shaanxi Province of China [2017JQ6017, 2015JM6322, 2015JZ019]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation of Northwest University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vessel segmentation as a component of medical image processing is the prerequisite for accurate diagnosis of vascular-related diseases. Manual delineation of blood vessels has been turned out to be time consuming and observer dependent. Therefore, much effort has been dedicated to the automatic or semi-automatic vessel segmentation methods. Previous literatures have reviewed the state of vessel segmentation methods from various perspectives. However, their reviews did not take the modern machine-learning methods especially deep neural networks into account. In this paper, we reviewed the state-of-the-art vessel segmentation methods by dividing them into two categories, rule-based, and machine-learning-based methods. The rule-based methods discriminate vessel structure from background relying on intuitively and exquisitely designed rule sets, while the machine-learning-based methods carry out the segmentation by self-learned rules from the previous experience. Instead of exhaustively listing all vessel segmentation methods, this paper focuses on the well-known blood vessel segmentation methods in recent years, to give readers a glimpse of the current state and future direction of segmentation technique for blood vessels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据