4.6 Article

Diffusion Tensor Imaging Marks Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Lesions in the Parkinsonian Monkey

期刊

MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 298-309

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mds.27201

关键词

Parkinson's disease; diffusion tensor imaging; monkey; dopamine; serotonin

资金

  1. Fondation de France [201234497, 00016818]
  2. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale [DEQ20110421326]
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-09-MNPS-018]
  4. Fondation L'Oreal grant (For Women in Science)
  5. program Investissements d'Avenir [ANR-11-IDEX-0007]
  6. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Diffusion tensor imaging has received major interest to highlight markers of neurodegeneration in Parkinson's disease. Whether the alteration of diffusion parameters mostly depicts dopaminergic lesions or can also reveal serotonergic denervation remains a question. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the best diffusion tensor imaging markers of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 3,4-methylene-dioxy-methamphetamine (MDMA; also known as ecstasy) lesions in the nonhuman primate. Methods: We acquired measures of mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy longitudinally (before and after MPTP and MDMA) and correlated them with severity of parkinsonism, PET imaging, and postmortem fiber quantification. Results: MPTP-induced lesions were associated with increases of mean diffusivity within both the caudate nucleus and the anterior cingulate cortex, whereas MDMA-induced lesions caused an increase of fractional anisotropy within the caudate nucleus. These variations of diffusion tensor imaging correlated with the motor score. Conclusion: Taken together, these results demonstrate that diffusion measures within specific brain regions can mark severity of dopaminergic and serotonergic induced lesions in a neurotoxic nonhuman primate model of Parkinson's disease. (c) 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据