3.8 Proceedings Paper

FAST: Frequency-Aware Indexing for Spatio-Textual Data Streams

出版社

IEEE
DOI: 10.1109/ICDE.2018.00036

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Many applications need to process massive streams of spatio-textual data in real-time against continuous spatio-textual queries. For example, in location-aware ad targeting publish/subscribe systems, it is required to disseminate millions of ads and promotions to millions of users based on the locations and textual profiles of users. In this paper, we study indexing of continuous spatio-textual queries. There exist several related spatio-textual indexes that typically integrate a spatial index with a textual index. However, these indexes usually have a high demand for main-memory and assume that the entire vocabulary of keywords is known in advance. Also, these indexes do not successfully capture the variations in the frequencies of keywords across different spatial regions and treat frequent and infrequent keywords in the same way. Moreover, existing indexes do not adapt to the changes in workload over space and time. For example, some keywords may be trending at certain times in certain locations and this may change as time passes. This affects the indexing and searching performance of existing indexes significantly. In this paper, we introduce FAST, a Frequency-Aware Spatio-Textual index for continuous spatio-textual queries. FAST is a main-memory index that requires up to one third of the memory needed by the state-of-the-art index. FAST does not assume prior knowledge of the entire vocabulary of indexed objects. FAST adaptively accounts for the difference in the frequencies of keywords within their corresponding spatial regions to automatically choose the best indexing approach that optimizes the insertion and search times. Extensive experimental evaluation using real and synthetic datasets demonstrates that FAST is up to 3x faster in search time and 5x faster in insertion time than the state-of-the-art indexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据