4.2 Article

Apoptosis regulator Bcl-2 is an independent prognostic marker for worse overall survival in triple-negative breast cancer patients

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MARKERS
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 109-115

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.5301/ijbm.5000291

关键词

B-cell lymphoma 2; Carbonic anhydrase IX; Ki-67 antigen; Triple-negative breast neoplasms; Tumor biomarkers; Tumor suppressor protein p53

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, Education and Sports of the Republic of Croatia [074-0982464-1187]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The objective of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), an endogenous marker for tumor hypoxia; the cellular tumor antigen p53; and the apoptosis regulator Bcl-2, in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. Methods: Immunohistochemically determined expression of CAIX, p53, Bcl-2 and proliferation factor Ki-67, analyzed in 64 paraffin-embedded TNBC tissue samples, was used to assess their relation to clinicopathological variables and prognostic implications for overall survival (OS). Results: Bcl-2 expression was negatively correlated with histological grade of tumor, while expression of p53 was positively correlated with the same clinical variable (p = 0.036 and p = 0.033, respectively). The p53 expression was also positively correlated with tumor size (p = 0.010). Survival analysis showed that patients with high Bcl-2 expression (above cutoff value determined by receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curve analysis) had shorter OS (p = 0.020). The same was observed for patients with tumors larger than 5 cm (p = 0.034) or positive lymph nodes (p = 0.004). Among all 3 examined markers, multivariate analysis showed that only Bcl-2 expression was a strong independent prognostic indicator for decreased OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 15.16, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.881-79.727, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Elevated expression of Bcl-2 was an independent prognostic factor for poorer OS in TNBC and as such a significant marker for tumor aggressiveness.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据