4.7 Article

Galaxy groups in the low-redshift Universe

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1462

关键词

methods: statistical; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation; galaxies: haloes

资金

  1. 973 Program [2015CB857002]
  2. national science foundation of China [11233005, 11621303, 11522324, 11421303, 11503065]
  3. NSF [AST-1517528, NSFC-11673015]
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  5. National Science Foundation [AST09-08846]
  6. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  7. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  8. Center for High-Performance Computing at the University of Utah
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1517528] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We apply a halo-based group finder to four large redshift surveys, the 2MRS (Two Micron All-Sky Redshift Survey), 6dFGS (Six-degree Field Galaxy Survey), SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey) and 2dFGRS (Two-degree Field Galaxy Redshift Survey), to construct group catalogues in the low-redshift Universe. The group finder is based on that of Yang et al. but with an improved halo mass assignment so that it can be applied uniformly to various redshift surveys of galaxies. Halo masses are assigned to groups according to proxies based on the stellar mass/luminosity of member galaxies. The performances of the group finder in grouping galaxies according to common haloes and in halo mass assignments are tested using realistic mock samples constructed from hydrodynamical simulations and empirical models of galaxy occupation in dark matter haloes. Our group finder finds similar to 94 per cent of the correct true member galaxies for 90-95 per cent of the groups in the mock samples; the halo masses assigned by the group finder are un-biased with respect to the true halo masses, and have a typical uncertainty of similar to 0.2 dex. The properties of group catalogues constructed from the observational samples are described and compared with other similar catalogues in the literature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据