4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Carbon-rich dust in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko measured by COSIMA/Rosetta

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx2640

关键词

astrochemistry; space vehicles: instruments; techniques: miscellaneous; comets: general; comets: individual: 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko

资金

  1. national funding agencies of Germany [Deutsches Zentrum fur Luftund Raumfahrt (DLR), France [50 QP 1302]
  2. (Centre National d'Etude Spatiales, CNES), Austria
  3. Finland and the European Space Agency (ESA)
  4. CNES
  5. Labex Exploration Spatiale des Environnements Planetaires (ESEP) [2011 LABX-030]
  6. Idex Paris Sciences et Lettres (PSL) [ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02]
  7. Labex Exploration Spatiale des Environnements Planetaires (ESEP)
  8. Academy of Finland grant [277375]
  9. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 26871-N20]
  10. Academy of Finland (AKA) [277375, 277375] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)
  11. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P26871] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cometary ices are rich in CO2, CO and organic volatile compounds, but the carbon content of cometary dust was only measured for the Oort Cloud comet 1P/Halley, during its flyby in 1986. The COmetary Secondary Ion Mass Analyzer (COSIMA)/Rosetta mass spectrometer analysed dust particles with sizes ranging from 50 to 1000 mu m, collected over 2 yr, from 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko (67P), a Jupiter family comet. Here, we report 67P dust composition focusing on the elements C and O. It has a high carbon content (atomic C/Si = 5.5(-1.2)(+1.4) on average) close to the solar value and comparable to the 1P/Halley data. From COSIMA measurements, we conclude that 67P particles are made of nearly 50 per cent organic matter in mass, mixed with mineral phases that are mostly anhydrous. The whole composition, rich in carbon and non-hydrated minerals, points to a primitive matter that likely preserved its initial characteristics since the comet accretion in the outer regions of the protoplanetary disc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据